I'm pretty new to StackExchange, so I apologize if this has been answered. I saw that on the Wiki academic books and articles are mentioned as good sources, and "encyclopedias" are not, yet many of the top answers here lack a good source, whether primary or secondary.

Moreover, I assume that most people here will be coming to this with a popular interest, not an academic one, so should we focus primarily on primary sources when they ask questions like "Did the Greeks worship the Titans" or should we feel free to load up the scholarship and direct them to that as well. Many of these issues (especially some unanswered questions!) are better answered by scholars than direct reading of the texts (mostly because there is so much information synthesized in a study that would be impossible to replicate as a single post).


  • 6
    You should definitely feel free to "load up the scholarship", as you put it. Even if many readers, including maybe the original asker of the question, may not be interested and/or able to understand an academia-level answer, your answer will definitely find its public.
    – plannapus
    Commented Jun 18, 2015 at 14:55
  • Are you asking whether it's OK for you to supply more academic answers? (in which case I'm pretty sure the answer will be unambiguous and loud "yes, please!"). Or are you asking whether it's OK for others to supply less academic answers in lieu of more academic ones as a requirement? (which would probably be more debated, as various SE sites impose different rigours)
    – DVK
    Commented Jun 30, 2015 at 5:15
  • I'm asking both. At some point a more academic answer could overwhelm the merely curious. Is that what we want? If so, should I include more "tl;dr" (in a more sophisticated and less patronizing way, of course)? So far I've been trying to keep it mostly academic but just written for anyone to understand, and not skimping either.
    – cmw Mod
    Commented Jun 30, 2015 at 5:23
  • 1
    @C.M.Weimer - (1) I'd recommend may be splitting that question into 2 independent ones (e.g. "are highly academic answers encouraged/welcome"; vs "are less academic answers discouraged"/"should we encourage ALL answers to be more academic"); (2) Frankly, I've never run into any answers on any SE sites where I said "too professional, won't be interested" - even if it was above my level of comprehension for that specialty; (3) "tl;dr" is a brilliant idea I would strongly support, it's just sophisticated enough, but you could use "executive summary" for a more pretensions version :)
    – DVK
    Commented Jun 30, 2015 at 5:52

1 Answer 1


Here's my personal opinion:

1. Reputable Sources should always be used.

I've written about this a lot, so I'm just going to quote from a relevant History SE Meta post:

Is this site an academic source?

My teacher recently rejected the idea of me using this site for a research paper, and I was wondering if you would think that this site could be considered a source.

Your teacher was right to do so. This website would probably be a bad source to use as a primary reference in a paper. Any random moron in the world with internet access is free to post an answer here. (For exhibit A, click my name below...)

However, if there's something that has you stumped in your research, I'd think it would be an excellent place to try to get your questions answered. Good answers here should be sourced with hyperlinks, so it would also (hopefully) be useful for digging up other references that are usable. Use the references we supply to help jump-start your research.

For anyone who is trying to do actual research, answers without sources are useless. I'm not even going to talk about how answers without sources are often inaccurate, but I've noticed that people who know where they got their information from usually don't misremember things or post incorrect facts.

Those two reasons are why, in my opinion, answers without reputable sources are essentially fabrications, and should be removed because they don't even answer the question. Of course, this isn't the site policy and many people disagree with me.

If you want to do something about it, leave a comment on unsourced answers asking for reputable sources. This is what I do, and here's the comment I leave:

May I encourage you to cite reputable sources (e.g. not wikipedia)? Doing so makes it easy to know if your answer is right, and also provides starting points to users who would like to learn more about the topic.

(You can speed this process up by using something like AutoReviewComments.)

2. Use both academic and primary sources.

If possible, use both! I do this in many of my answers. They are both reputable sources.

To elaborate, this site is in a weird position academically, because mythology is a hybrid between literature, history, anthropology, and religious studies. Some questions are better answered with an academic study, some questions are better answered with a close reading of the text in question, and some questions are best answered with a combination of the two. Use your judgement.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .